Do you have such experience
when doing copy and paste on macOS?
在 macOS 上使用複製貼上整理檔案時
你是否也有以下的經驗呢？
Disaster
世紀災難
Missing files after replace
按下取代後，檔案消失了
Copy a folder and paste it directly to Replace another folder with same name, the destination of folder would just seem to be removed all child folders and files first, then paste rest from source folder. It actions like in duplicate.
Cool, but useless and ruin everything.
複製並貼上相同名稱的資料夾，若選擇取代，則你的目的資料夾會和來源資料夾長的一模一樣， 就好像目地資料夾先被刪掉，然後在把來源資料夾複製過來。
這很酷，但一點用處都沒有，而且毀了一切。
Replace
取代
Exhausted
精疲力盡
Dragging with option
按著 option 並拖拉
Actually, if folder wants to be merged with another. The right way to do it is dragging souce folder to the destination and hold option key before you release dragging. It can be really frustrating and making mistake easily if you repeat again and again.
Especially, do it with touchpad. No Kidding!
事實上，若你想要在複製貼上時，將兩個相同名稱資料夾底下的檔案做合併，你可以拖拉來源資料夾，到目的資料夾上，然後在你放開拖拉前，先按著 option 即可。 要大量重複相同動作，卻沒辦法使用熱鍵來完成，這令人十分沮喪，而且拖拉的過程也容易出錯。
不開玩笑！尤其是當你使用觸控板時。
⌥
option
Weird
毫無頭緒
Something goes wrong
有點不對勁
You may find out some file in destination of folder is still old one, but rest of files are overwrited correctly. The rule is depended on date time of file. The new one will keep and not be overwrited, but you can not detect it until something finally goes wrong.
Why? We can simply do it like Windows or Linux, right?
拖拉合併時，日期比較新的檔案，就被忽略而不覆蓋？這是個難以被注意的規則，直到你的作品出錯了，你甚至還無法意識到是這個原因造成的。
為什麼需要如此特殊的行為呢？我們可以像 Windows 和 Linux 一樣簡單，不是嗎？
File_X 檔案X
Overwritten 覆蓋
File_Y 檔案Y
Overwritten 覆蓋
File_Z 檔案Z
Ignored 忽略
No need to worry anymore !
不需要再擔心這些了！
Here is an Automator service you can try
你可以試試看這個 Automator 服務
Ｏpen source for free
開源專案，完全免費